| 379 |
23 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 381 |
23 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 388 |
23 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 415 |
25 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 417 |
25 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 422 |
25 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 439 |
26 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 452 |
27 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 462 |
28 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional social co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 465 |
28 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 476 |
28 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 482 |
29 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 490 |
29 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 507 |
30 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 510 |
30 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 527 |
31 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 541 |
32 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 548 |
33 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 550 |
33 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 553 |
33 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 554 |
33 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 561 |
33 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 566 |
34 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 567 |
34 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 568 |
34 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 570 |
34 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 571 |
34 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 584 |
35 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 588 |
35 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 600 |
36 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 604 |
36 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 605 |
36 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 609 |
36 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 611 |
36 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 612 |
36 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 621 |
37 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 626 |
37 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 632 |
38 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional social co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 635 |
38 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 639 |
38 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 643 |
38 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 650 |
39 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 653 |
39 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 660 |
39 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 661 |
39 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders |
2 |
| 663 |
39 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 667 |
40 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disadvantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 677 |
40 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 679 |
40 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 680 |
40 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 684 |
41 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
|
2 |
| 696 |
41 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
|
2 |
| 701 |
42 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 702 |
42 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 704 |
42 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 711 |
42 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 714 |
42 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 728 |
43 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 731 |
43 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 736 |
44 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 738 |
44 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 747 |
44 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 751 |
45 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional social co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 762 |
45 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 768 |
46 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional social co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 775 |
46 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 779 |
46 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 781 |
46 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 787 |
47 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 799 |
47 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 803 |
48 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 816 |
48 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 821 |
49 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 833 |
49 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 838 |
50 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 842 |
50 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 847 |
50 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 850 |
50 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 854 |
51 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 857 |
51 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 864 |
51 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 867 |
51 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 872 |
52 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 874 |
52 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 884 |
52 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 889 |
53 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 906 |
54 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 908 |
54 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 915 |
54 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 922 |
55 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 924 |
55 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 928 |
55 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 932 |
55 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 934 |
55 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 939 |
56 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 949 |
56 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 951 |
56 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 961 |
57 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 966 |
57 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 968 |
57 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 969 |
57 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |