| 7 |
1 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 21 |
2 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 23 |
2 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 26 |
2 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 32 |
2 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders |
2 |
| 33 |
2 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 34 |
2 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 36 |
3 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Impact |
Efficacy contributing to adaptation goals |
Vulnerabilities assessed using global evidence |
2 |
| 40 |
3 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 49 |
3 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders |
2 |
| 56 |
4 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 60 |
4 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 73 |
5 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 77 |
5 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 84 |
5 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 89 |
6 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 96 |
6 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project provides limited support to address capacity needs |
2 |
| 101 |
6 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 102 |
6 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 106 |
7 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 112 |
7 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 117 |
7 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders |
2 |
| 125 |
8 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 128 |
8 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 129 |
8 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 135 |
8 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 136 |
8 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 141 |
9 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 151 |
9 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders |
2 |
| 158 |
10 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 160 |
10 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 163 |
10 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 168 |
10 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders |
2 |
| 169 |
10 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 177 |
11 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 179 |
11 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 180 |
11 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 185 |
11 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders |
2 |
| 186 |
11 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 187 |
11 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 208 |
13 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 211 |
13 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 214 |
13 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 219 |
13 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders |
2 |
| 220 |
13 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 221 |
13 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 225 |
14 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 228 |
14 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 235 |
14 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 244 |
15 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 248 |
15 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 253 |
15 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders |
2 |
| 260 |
16 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 265 |
16 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 270 |
16 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders |
2 |
| 271 |
16 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 273 |
17 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Effectiveness |
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Outputs outlined |
2 |
| 274 |
17 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Impact |
Efficacy contributing to adaptation goals |
Vulnerabilities assessed using global evidence |
2 |
| 282 |
17 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 287 |
17 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders |
2 |
| 289 |
17 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 290 |
18 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Effectiveness |
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Outputs outlined |
2 |
| 294 |
18 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 296 |
18 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 305 |
18 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 311 |
19 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 320 |
19 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 321 |
19 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders |
2 |
| 322 |
19 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 323 |
19 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 326 |
20 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional social co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 329 |
20 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 330 |
20 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 333 |
20 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 337 |
20 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 339 |
20 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 344 |
21 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) |
2 |
| 347 |
21 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 349 |
21 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 354 |
21 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 356 |
21 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) |
2 |
| 357 |
21 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 362 |
22 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 366 |
22 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 367 |
22 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 371 |
22 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 374 |
22 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 377 |
23 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional social co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 379 |
23 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from a single source |
2 |
| 381 |
23 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 388 |
23 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 415 |
25 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them |
2 |
| 417 |
25 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
2 |
| 422 |
25 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 439 |
26 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |
| 452 |
27 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years |
2 |
| 462 |
28 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional social co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 465 |
28 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 476 |
28 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project |
2 |
| 482 |
29 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal |
2 |
| 490 |
29 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments |
2 |