| 269 |
16 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires 'soft' investements |
3 |
| 272 |
16 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders participated in design and planning processes of the project |
3 |
| 276 |
17 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disadvantaged group (defined geographically and socio-economically) |
3 |
| 278 |
17 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided two additional environmental co-benefits to the main adaptation goal |
3 |
| 280 |
17 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Externalities |
Negative impacts were identified and measures put in place to minimize them |
3 |
| 281 |
17 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
Two types of different measures proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
3 |
| 283 |
17 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 284 |
17 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Coherence |
Development Strategies: Contribution to national development goals/strategies |
The project's adaptation goals are/were aligned to a national develoment strategy for a specific sector |
3 |
| 297 |
18 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Externalities |
Negative impacts were identified and measures put in place to minimize them |
3 |
| 298 |
18 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
Two types of different measures proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
3 |
| 300 |
18 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 304 |
18 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were shared by private and public stakeholders |
3 |
| 306 |
18 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders participated in design and planning processes of the project |
3 |
| 312 |
19 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided two additional environmental co-benefits to the main adaptation goal |
3 |
| 314 |
19 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Externalities |
Negative impacts were identified and measures put in place to minimize them |
3 |
| 315 |
19 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
Two types of different measures proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
3 |
| 317 |
19 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 324 |
20 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Effectiveness |
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Monitoring mechanisms planned or in place |
3 |
| 328 |
20 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from multiple sources |
3 |
| 331 |
20 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Externalities |
Negative impacts were identified and measures put in place to minimize them |
3 |
| 332 |
20 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
Two types of different measures proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
3 |
| 334 |
20 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 341 |
21 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Effectiveness |
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Monitoring mechanisms planned or in place |
3 |
| 346 |
21 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided two additional environmental co-benefits to the main adaptation goal |
3 |
| 348 |
21 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Externalities |
Negative impacts were identified and measures put in place to minimize them |
3 |
| 351 |
21 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 355 |
21 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were shared by private and public stakeholders |
3 |
| 358 |
22 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Effectiveness |
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Monitoring mechanisms planned or in place |
3 |
| 359 |
22 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Impact |
Efficacy contributing to adaptation goals |
Vulnerabilities assessed using national evidence |
3 |
| 360 |
22 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
The project provided two additional social co-benefits to the main adaptation goal |
3 |
| 363 |
22 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided two additional environmental co-benefits to the main adaptation goal |
3 |
| 368 |
22 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 372 |
22 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were shared by private and public stakeholders |
3 |
| 373 |
22 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates multiple stakeholderes and has a business model case and or a finance mechanism to continue opperations beyond the project lifetime |
3 |
| 375 |
23 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Effectiveness |
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Monitoring mechanisms planned or in place |
3 |
| 383 |
23 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
Two types of different measures proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
3 |
| 385 |
23 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 387 |
23 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Coherence |
Development Strategies: Contribution to International development goals/strategies (E.g SDGs, Sendai Framework, NDCs, NAPs) |
The project's adaptation goals are/were aligned to (two) of the nation's international commitments and agendas |
3 |
| 389 |
23 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were shared by private and public stakeholders |
3 |
| 390 |
23 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates multiple stakeholderes and has a business model case and or a finance mechanism to continue opperations beyond the project lifetime |
3 |
| 391 |
23 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders participated in design and planning processes of the project |
3 |
| 392 |
24 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Effectiveness |
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Monitoring mechanisms planned or in place |
3 |
| 393 |
24 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Impact |
Efficacy contributing to adaptation goals |
Vulnerabilities assessed using national evidence |
3 |
| 397 |
24 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided two additional environmental co-benefits to the main adaptation goal |
3 |
| 398 |
24 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project accounted for and quantified mitigation synergies with adaptation |
3 |
| 401 |
24 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benefits of the project will be perceived within a year/season |
3 |
| 402 |
24 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 405 |
24 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires 'soft' investements |
3 |
| 406 |
24 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were shared by private and public stakeholders |
3 |
| 407 |
24 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates multiple stakeholderes and has a business model case and or a finance mechanism to continue opperations beyond the project lifetime |
3 |
| 408 |
24 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders participated in design and planning processes of the project |
3 |
| 409 |
25 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Effectiveness |
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Monitoring mechanisms planned or in place |
3 |
| 410 |
25 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Impact |
Efficacy contributing to adaptation goals |
Vulnerabilities assessed using national evidence |
3 |
| 411 |
25 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
The project provided two additional social co-benefits to the main adaptation goal |
3 |
| 414 |
25 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
The project provided two additional environmental co-benefits to the main adaptation goal |
3 |
| 418 |
25 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benefits of the project will be perceived within a year/season |
3 |
| 419 |
25 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 423 |
25 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were shared by private and public stakeholders |
3 |
| 425 |
25 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders participated in design and planning processes of the project |
3 |
| 426 |
26 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Effectiveness |
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Monitoring mechanisms planned or in place |
3 |
| 433 |
26 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Externalities |
Negative impacts were identified and measures put in place to minimize them |
3 |
| 436 |
26 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 440 |
26 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were shared by private and public stakeholders |
3 |
| 443 |
27 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Effectiveness |
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Monitoring mechanisms planned or in place |
3 |
| 445 |
27 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
The project provided two additional social co-benefits to the main adaptation goal |
3 |
| 447 |
27 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from multiple sources |
3 |
| 451 |
27 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
Two types of different measures proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
3 |
| 453 |
27 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 457 |
27 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were shared by private and public stakeholders |
3 |
| 459 |
27 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders participated in design and planning processes of the project |
3 |
| 460 |
28 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Effectiveness |
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Monitoring mechanisms planned or in place |
3 |
| 463 |
28 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disadvantaged group (defined geographically and socio-economically) |
3 |
| 464 |
28 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Business Opportunities |
Revenues are likely to increase from multiple sources |
3 |
| 466 |
28 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project accounted for and quantified mitigation synergies with adaptation |
3 |
| 468 |
28 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
Two types of different measures proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
3 |
| 469 |
28 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Implementation time-frame |
The benefits of the project will be perceived within a year/season |
3 |
| 470 |
28 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 472 |
28 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Coherence |
Development Strategies: Contribution to International development goals/strategies (E.g SDGs, Sendai Framework, NDCs, NAPs) |
The project's adaptation goals are/were aligned to (two) of the nation's international commitments and agendas |
3 |
| 473 |
28 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Efficiency for replicability |
The project requires 'soft' investements |
3 |
| 474 |
28 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were shared by private and public stakeholders |
3 |
| 478 |
29 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Impact |
Efficacy contributing to adaptation goals |
Vulnerabilities assessed using national evidence |
3 |
| 479 |
29 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
The project provided two additional social co-benefits to the main adaptation goal |
3 |
| 483 |
29 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project accounted for and quantified mitigation synergies with adaptation |
3 |
| 484 |
29 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Externalities |
Negative impacts were identified and measures put in place to minimize them |
3 |
| 485 |
29 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
Two types of different measures proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
3 |
| 487 |
29 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 491 |
29 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were shared by private and public stakeholders |
3 |
| 492 |
29 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates multiple stakeholderes and has a business model case and or a finance mechanism to continue opperations beyond the project lifetime |
3 |
| 493 |
29 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Legitimacy |
Participatory Processes |
Local stakeholders participated in design and planning processes of the project |
3 |
| 494 |
30 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Effectiveness |
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Monitoring mechanisms planned or in place |
3 |
| 497 |
30 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Social Co-benefits |
Equity |
The project targeted a disadvantaged group (defined geographically and socio-economically) |
3 |
| 500 |
30 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Mitigation synergies |
The project accounted for and quantified mitigation synergies with adaptation |
3 |
| 501 |
30 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Externalities |
Negative impacts were identified and measures put in place to minimize them |
3 |
| 502 |
30 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
Two types of different measures proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
3 |
| 504 |
30 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Easiness for Implementation |
Institutional Capacity within the expected time-frame |
The project address capacity needs |
3 |
| 506 |
30 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Coherence |
Development Strategies: Contribution to International development goals/strategies (E.g SDGs, Sendai Framework, NDCs, NAPs) |
The project's adaptation goals are/were aligned to (two) of the nation's international commitments and agendas |
3 |
| 508 |
30 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Efficiency |
Investment cost |
The costs of the project were shared by private and public stakeholders |
3 |
| 509 |
30 |
Scalability & Replicability |
Sustainability |
Sustainability |
The project integrates multiple stakeholderes and has a business model case and or a finance mechanism to continue opperations beyond the project lifetime |
3 |
| 511 |
31 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Effectiveness |
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Monitoring mechanisms planned or in place |
3 |
| 518 |
31 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Environmental Co-benefits |
Externalities |
Negative impacts were identified and measures put in place to minimize them |
3 |
| 519 |
31 |
Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits |
Relevance |
Legitimacy |
Two types of different measures proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) |
3 |