adaptation_solution_score
355 rows where Score = 2 sorted by ID
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: Domain, Criteria, Variable, Rational_for_the_Platform
| Link | rowid | ID ▼ | Domain | Criteria | Variable | Rational_for_the_Platform | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 7 | 1 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Mitigation synergies | The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them | 2 |
| 158 | 158 | 10 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Business Opportunities | Revenues are likely to increase from a single source | 2 |
| 160 | 160 | 10 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Mitigation synergies | The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them | 2 |
| 163 | 163 | 10 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Implementation time-frame | The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years | 2 |
| 168 | 168 | 10 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Investment cost | The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders | 2 |
| 169 | 169 | 10 | Scalability & Replicability | Sustainability | Sustainability | The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) | 2 |
| 1698 | 1698 | 100 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Investment cost | 2 | |
| 177 | 177 | 11 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Mitigation synergies | The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them | 2 |
| 179 | 179 | 11 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Legitimacy | One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) | 2 |
| 180 | 180 | 11 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Implementation time-frame | The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years | 2 |
| 185 | 185 | 11 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Investment cost | The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders | 2 |
| 186 | 186 | 11 | Scalability & Replicability | Sustainability | Sustainability | The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) | 2 |
| 187 | 187 | 11 | Scalability & Replicability | Legitimacy | Participatory Processes | Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project | 2 |
| 208 | 208 | 13 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Equity | The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) | 2 |
| 211 | 211 | 13 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Mitigation synergies | The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them | 2 |
| 214 | 214 | 13 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Implementation time-frame | The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years | 2 |
| 219 | 219 | 13 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Investment cost | The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders | 2 |
| 220 | 220 | 13 | Scalability & Replicability | Sustainability | Sustainability | The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) | 2 |
| 221 | 221 | 13 | Scalability & Replicability | Legitimacy | Participatory Processes | Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project | 2 |
| 225 | 225 | 14 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Equity | The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) | 2 |
| 228 | 228 | 14 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Mitigation synergies | The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them | 2 |
| 235 | 235 | 14 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Efficiency for replicability | The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments | 2 |
| 244 | 244 | 15 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal | 2 |
| 248 | 248 | 15 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Implementation time-frame | The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years | 2 |
| 253 | 253 | 15 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Investment cost | The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders | 2 |
| 260 | 260 | 16 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Business Opportunities | Revenues are likely to increase from a single source | 2 |
| 265 | 265 | 16 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Implementation time-frame | The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years | 2 |
| 270 | 270 | 16 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Investment cost | The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders | 2 |
| 271 | 271 | 16 | Scalability & Replicability | Sustainability | Sustainability | The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) | 2 |
| 273 | 273 | 17 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Effectiveness | Monitoring & Evaluation | Outputs outlined | 2 |
| 274 | 274 | 17 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Impact | Efficacy contributing to adaptation goals | Vulnerabilities assessed using global evidence | 2 |
| 282 | 282 | 17 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Implementation time-frame | The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years | 2 |
| 287 | 287 | 17 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Investment cost | The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders | 2 |
| 289 | 289 | 17 | Scalability & Replicability | Legitimacy | Participatory Processes | Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project | 2 |
| 290 | 290 | 18 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Effectiveness | Monitoring & Evaluation | Outputs outlined | 2 |
| 294 | 294 | 18 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Business Opportunities | Revenues are likely to increase from a single source | 2 |
| 296 | 296 | 18 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Mitigation synergies | The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them | 2 |
| 305 | 305 | 18 | Scalability & Replicability | Sustainability | Sustainability | The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) | 2 |
| 311 | 311 | 19 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Business Opportunities | Revenues are likely to increase from a single source | 2 |
| 320 | 320 | 19 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Efficiency for replicability | The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments | 2 |
| 321 | 321 | 19 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Investment cost | The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders | 2 |
| 322 | 322 | 19 | Scalability & Replicability | Sustainability | Sustainability | The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) | 2 |
| 323 | 323 | 19 | Scalability & Replicability | Legitimacy | Participatory Processes | Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project | 2 |
| 21 | 21 | 2 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Equity | The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) | 2 |
| 23 | 23 | 2 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal | 2 |
| 26 | 26 | 2 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Legitimacy | One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) | 2 |
| 32 | 32 | 2 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Investment cost | The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders | 2 |
| 33 | 33 | 2 | Scalability & Replicability | Sustainability | Sustainability | The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) | 2 |
| 34 | 34 | 2 | Scalability & Replicability | Legitimacy | Participatory Processes | Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project | 2 |
| 326 | 326 | 20 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | The project provided one additional social co-benefit to the main adaptation goal | 2 |
| 329 | 329 | 20 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal | 2 |
| 330 | 330 | 20 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Mitigation synergies | The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them | 2 |
| 333 | 333 | 20 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Implementation time-frame | The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years | 2 |
| 337 | 337 | 20 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Efficiency for replicability | The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments | 2 |
| 339 | 339 | 20 | Scalability & Replicability | Sustainability | Sustainability | The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) | 2 |
| 344 | 344 | 21 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Equity | The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) | 2 |
| 347 | 347 | 21 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Mitigation synergies | The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them | 2 |
| 349 | 349 | 21 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Legitimacy | One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) | 2 |
| 354 | 354 | 21 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Efficiency for replicability | The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments | 2 |
| 356 | 356 | 21 | Scalability & Replicability | Sustainability | Sustainability | The project integrates institutions from the national to local level, and shows diverse stakeholders (public, private, civil society) | 2 |
| 357 | 357 | 21 | Scalability & Replicability | Legitimacy | Participatory Processes | Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project | 2 |
| 362 | 362 | 22 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Business Opportunities | Revenues are likely to increase from a single source | 2 |
| 366 | 366 | 22 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Legitimacy | One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) | 2 |
| 367 | 367 | 22 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Implementation time-frame | The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years | 2 |
| 371 | 371 | 22 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Efficiency for replicability | The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments | 2 |
| 374 | 374 | 22 | Scalability & Replicability | Legitimacy | Participatory Processes | Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project | 2 |
| 377 | 377 | 23 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | The project provided one additional social co-benefit to the main adaptation goal | 2 |
| 379 | 379 | 23 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Business Opportunities | Revenues are likely to increase from a single source | 2 |
| 381 | 381 | 23 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Mitigation synergies | The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them | 2 |
| 388 | 388 | 23 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Efficiency for replicability | The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments | 2 |
| 415 | 415 | 25 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Mitigation synergies | The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them | 2 |
| 417 | 417 | 25 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Legitimacy | One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) | 2 |
| 422 | 422 | 25 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Efficiency for replicability | The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments | 2 |
| 439 | 439 | 26 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Efficiency for replicability | The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments | 2 |
| 452 | 452 | 27 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Implementation time-frame | The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years | 2 |
| 462 | 462 | 28 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | The project provided one additional social co-benefit to the main adaptation goal | 2 |
| 465 | 465 | 28 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal | 2 |
| 476 | 476 | 28 | Scalability & Replicability | Legitimacy | Participatory Processes | Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project | 2 |
| 482 | 482 | 29 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal | 2 |
| 490 | 490 | 29 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Efficiency for replicability | The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments | 2 |
| 36 | 36 | 3 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Impact | Efficacy contributing to adaptation goals | Vulnerabilities assessed using global evidence | 2 |
| 40 | 40 | 3 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal | 2 |
| 49 | 49 | 3 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Investment cost | The costs of the project were incurred by private or public stakeholders | 2 |
| 507 | 507 | 30 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Efficiency for replicability | The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments | 2 |
| 510 | 510 | 30 | Scalability & Replicability | Legitimacy | Participatory Processes | Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project | 2 |
| 527 | 527 | 31 | Scalability & Replicability | Legitimacy | Participatory Processes | Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project | 2 |
| 541 | 541 | 32 | Scalability & Replicability | Efficiency | Efficiency for replicability | The project requires minor 'hard' investments and large 'soft' investments | 2 |
| 548 | 548 | 33 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Equity | The project targeted a disdavantaged group (defined geographically) | 2 |
| 550 | 550 | 33 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal | 2 |
| 553 | 553 | 33 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Legitimacy | One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) | 2 |
| 554 | 554 | 33 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Implementation time-frame | The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years | 2 |
| 561 | 561 | 33 | Scalability & Replicability | Legitimacy | Participatory Processes | Local stakeholders were consulted to design adaptation measures of the project | 2 |
| 566 | 566 | 34 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Business Opportunities | Revenues are likely to increase from a single source | 2 |
| 567 | 567 | 34 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal | 2 |
| 568 | 568 | 34 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Mitigation synergies | The project identified synergies with mitigation, but did not quantify them | 2 |
| 570 | 570 | 34 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Legitimacy | One type of measure proposed (coping, adaptative, transformative) | 2 |
| 571 | 571 | 34 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Implementation time-frame | The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years | 2 |
| 584 | 584 | 35 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | Environmental Co-benefits | The project provided one additional environmental co-benefit to the main adaptation goal | 2 |
| 588 | 588 | 35 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Relevance | Implementation time-frame | The benfits of the project will be perceived in several years | 2 |
| 600 | 600 | 36 | Contribution to adaptation goal & co-benefits | Social Co-benefits | Business Opportunities | Revenues are likely to increase from a single source | 2 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited
CREATE TABLE "adaptation_solution_score" ( "ID" VARCHAR(255) NULL, "Domain" VARCHAR(255) NULL, "Criteria" VARCHAR(255) NULL, "Variable" VARCHAR(255) NULL, "Rational_for_the_Platform" VARCHAR(255) NULL, "Score" VARCHAR(255) NULL );